Universities – Evidence identifies ancient Aboriginal mining in the Riverland – Flinders

Source: Flinders University

Flinders University researchers, in partnership with the River Murray and Mallee Aboriginal Corporation, have found evidence that points to 7000 years of Aboriginal mining of stones at Sugarloaf Hill in South Australia’s Riverland.

The dating has formed part of the first detailed investigation into an Aboriginal chert and silcrete quarry in the Riverland region.
These hard, fine-grained rocks were mined by Aboriginal people to craft tools, weapons and for trade – with Riverland-sourced materials likely to have been widely redistributed beyond this area.
The Sugarloaf Hill Quarry represents one of several sources of silcrete and chert traditionally utilised by Aboriginal people within a highly localised region of the Murray River corridor between Berribee in northwestern Victoria and Overland Corner in SA.
Given the scale of the Sugarloaf Hill Quarry, this site was an important source of material, though is less emphasised in historical literature.
“The key outcome from our research has been establishing a plausible timeline for the mining of these materials at Sugarloaf Hill,” says lead researcher Dr Craig Westell, from the Archaeology discipline at Flinders University.
Chronologies established at quarries elsewhere in Australia have provided valuable context for this essential aspect of Aboriginal life and an appreciation of the sociocultural and political systems embedded in it.
“We believe similar outcomes can be achieved in the Riverland through further integration of ethnohistorical, archaeological and contemporary community views,” says Dr Westell.
The timing and nature of exchange in fine-grain siliceous materials sourced from the Riverland quarries may contribute to an ever more nuanced appreciation of the many entangled aspects of Aboriginal society and economies in the southwestern region of the Murray Darling Basin.
This new chronology also allows comparison to stone quarries elsewhere in Australia.
The team will conduct further research to compare other Riverland quarries and determine whether this timeline is representative of the use of Riverland stone sources more generally.
“The relationships that Aboriginal people share with their ancestors, the river and land shaped connections and responsibilities to country and ultimately systems of traditional land ownership. Stone quarries are an essential part of this inheritance,” says co-author Professor Amy Roberts, Deputy Director of the ARC Centre for Transforming Human Origins Research at Flinders University.
“This timeline demonstrates both the deep time and long-term connections that our ancestors have maintained with all aspects of our riverscape,” says Sheryl Giles, a spokesperson for the River Murray and Mallee Aboriginal Corporation.
The research – “7000 Years of Aboriginal Mining at Sugarloaf Hill in the Riverland Region of South Australia”, by Craig Westell, Ian Moffat, Richard Fullagar, Amy Roberts, Justine Kemp, Mike Morley, Marc Fairhead and Simon Hoad – has been published in Archaeology in Oceania. DOI: 10.1002/arco.70028
• The research has been funded by the Australian Research Council for the project entitled ‘Rockshelters and Rock Art in the River Murray Gorge: New Data and Syntheses’ (LP200200803). Amy Roberts is the recipient of an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT230100499). Ian Moffat is the recipient of an ARC Future Fellowship (project number #FT220100184).

Energy Sector – Proposal for environmental impact assessment programme for Wisting submitted for public consultation

Source: Equinor

26 June 2026 – Equinor and its partners have today submitted for public consultation a proposed programme for the environmental impact assessment of a possible Wisting field development in the Barents Sea.

The project is still at an early stage, and further progress will depend on additional improvements to achieve a profitable and viable project.

Wisting is the largest oil discovery on the Norwegian continental shelf yet to be developed, with estimated recoverable volumes of just under 500 million barrels of oil equivalent.

“We have made significant improvements to Wisting since the postponement in 2022, but considerable work remains before we can determine whether there is a basis for a final investment decision. Power from shore has been thoroughly assessed but was ruled out due to technical complexity and high costs. We are now continuing our work on power generation based on an energy-efficient gas turbine solution,” says Trond Bokn, Equinor's senior vice president for project development.

The partnership has selected a floating production and storage vessel (FPSO) for Wisting. As part of the continued work, the project will also assess the potential for carbon capture and storage (CCS), with the aim of reducing CO₂ emissions from production. Such a solution is relevant for Wisting given the size of the power facility and the fact that the installation is being developed as a newbuild.

Further maturation work and sub-studies are now under way in the project. The partnership plans to decide on the final concept selection and possible continuation towards the end of 2026. The solutions must meet requirements for safe and efficient operations in the Barents Sea.

Any continuation of a CCS solution will depend on the necessary technological and regulatory conditions being in place within acceptable cost and time frames, both for the power turbine and for a possible CCS facility. A final investment decision is planned for the end of 2027.

If the project is realised, Wisting will generate substantial revenues for Norwegian society. A development would also create significant ripple effects in the Norwegian supplier industry, both during the development phase and throughout operations:

  • The largest and most lasting ripple effects from Wisting will come from around 30 years of operations. Nearly all activity related to operations will take place in Norway and contribute to value creation and jobs in industry nationally and regionally for decades to come.
  • Drilling and wells, together with the subsea development, account for around half of the total investment in a Wisting development. The majority of this activity will generate value creation in Norwegian industry.
  • Norwegian suppliers will be given an exclusive opportunity to demonstrate competitiveness in the engineering, procurement and construction of the modules for the production vessel on Wisting. In addition, procurement activity will create significant opportunities for the many equipment suppliers in Norway.
  • The hull itself cannot be built at Norwegian yards due to size and necessary infrastructure.

The proposed programme for the environmental impact assessment is now being submitted for public consultation as part of the continued maturation of the project. The public consultation period is set at 16 weeks.

More information is available on equinor.com – see the link below.

Licensees in Wisting: *Equinor Energy AS (42,5%), *Aker BP ASA (27,5%), Petoro AS (20%) and INPEX Idemitsu Norge AS (10%).

*After transactions between Equinor and Aker BP, pending government approval.

Facts about Wisting

Wisting (PL 537) was discovered in 2013 in the Hoop area of the Barents Sea
Wisting is located around 310 km north of Hammerfest
Water depth between 390 and 418 metres.

Syria: Explosive ordnance continues to injure and kill civilians in Deir Ez-Zor while access to healthcare remains limited

Source: Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF)

Deir Ez-Zor, Syria, 25 June 2026: One year after Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) began supporting emergency services at Deir Ez-Zor National Hospital (DNH), hundreds of people injured by explosive ordnance have been treated at the hospital, highlighting the devastating and ongoing impact of contamination left behind by years of conflict.

MSF published a report Explosive Remnants of War – Lasting Harm in Deir Ez-Zor, Syria on the human and health impact of explosive ordnance contamination in Deir Ez-Zor governorate. It highlights the key barriers to accessing timely, comprehensive, and specialized care, as well as the critical role of mine action actors in the governorate. The report draws on MSF and the Directorate of Health (DoH) medical data, covering the period from April 2025 to April 2026, as well as operational observations and interviews with patients, caretakers, and medical professionals involved in the provision of care.

Between April 2025 and April 2026, MSF and DoH teams in the emergency room of Deir Ez-Zor National Hospital treated more than 215 people injured by landmines, unexploded ordnance, and abandoned explosives. Nearly half of the patients were children. During this period, 24 people died from their injuries, and 58 patients underwent traumatic amputations.

Deir Ez-Zor remains one of the areas most heavily contaminated by explosive ordnance in Syria. Civilians are often injured while carrying out daily activities such as farming, herding livestock, collecting truffles, or returning to damaged homes and buildings. Children are particularly at risk while playing outdoors or exploring abandoned buildings. Many survivors travel long and dangerous distances from remote areas to reach emergency care, often without access to ambulances.

“For the year that we’ve been working here, we’ve seen over 215 patients suffering from blast injuries, including children and farmers working their land,” said Rebecca Kerr, MSF project coordinator in Deir Ez-Zor. “Unfortunately, even today, we’re still seeing civilians being impacted by these explosives. Without improved trauma care, rehabilitation services, and clearance of contaminated land, these injuries will continue.”

Despite the high number of trauma survivors and amputees, access to rehabilitation, prosthetics and orthotics, specialized mental health care, and socio-economic support remains severely limited, leaving many patients unable to recover or regain their independence.

Mohammad, a young man from Deir Ez-Zor who lost both legs above the knee after stepping on a landmine while working his land, described how his life has changed: “Before, I worked every day and supported myself. Now I spend most of my time at home, and I depend on my family for almost everything. If I had access to artificial limbs, maybe I could regain part of my life.”

Medical staff at DNH also highlight the economic pressures driving risk-taking behavior. “Some people knowingly enter mined areas to graze their flocks or gather truffles,” said Dr. Waseem Awak, resident doctor in the emergency and orthopedic departments. “In some cases, we treat multiple members of the same family.”

Access to emergency trauma care remains a major challenge across the governorate. Shortages of specialized medical staff, limited equipment, and weak post-discharge services increase the risk of complications and death. “The number of injuries often exceeds the hospital’s capacity,” said Dr. Ammar Al Rajab, head of the DNH orthopedic department. “Post-discharge care is particularly weak, with a critical lack of prosthetics specialists and rehabilitation services.”

MSF calls for an urgent acceleration of mine clearance and explosive ordnance disposal across Deir Ez-Zor as a first and critical step to prevent further civilian harm. This must be accompanied by sustained investment in emergency trauma care — particularly in remote and underserved areas—and comprehensive victim assistance services, including rehabilitation and mental health care. Without a significant scale-up of clearance efforts that matches the extent of contamination, civilians will continue to be injured and killed while carrying out daily activities.

MSF has also witnessed how contamination continues to affect humanitarian operations and access to essential services. Some healthcare facilities, water infrastructure, and residential areas remain contaminated, limiting safe access for communities and humanitarian organizations alike. Mine action activities, including survey, clearance, and risk education, remain essential to reducing civilian harm and enabling humanitarian response and recovery efforts.

Since April 2025, MSF has been supporting the emergency room at DNH in collaboration with the DoH, providing emergency care, laboratory services, infection prevention and control, sterilization, and water and sanitation support. MSF has also supported staff training, established a triage system, improved patient flow, rehabilitated the hospital’s waste management area, and installed new incinerators and an X-ray machine.

MSF reiterates that without urgent action to accelerate the clearance of land contaminated by explosive ordnance and landmines, alongside efforts to address critical gaps in specialized care—including rehabilitation, prosthetics, and mental health services—civilians in Deir Ez-Zor will continue to suffer preventable deaths and life-altering injuries long after the conflict has ended.

Sharing link to the report Explosive Remnants of War – Lasting Harm in Deir Ez-Zor, Syria 202606_SYRIA_DEZ ERW_REP_EN_FINAL_web.pdf

MSF is an international, medical, humanitarian organisation that delivers medical care to people in need, regardless of their origin, religion, or political affiliation.  MSF Australia was established in 1995 and is one of 24 international MSF sections committed to delivering medical humanitarian assistance to people in crisis. Every year more than 120 Australians and New Zealanders go on assignment with Médecins Sans Frontières  working as: doctors, midwives, psychologists, laboratory technicians, human resource/finance coordinators, pharmacists, mental health specialists and logisticians. MSF delivers medical care based on need alone and operates independently of government, religion or economic influence and irrespective of race, religion or gender. For more information visit msf.org.au  

Indonesia – Stronger policy signals needed to unlock US$200 billion in Asean energy investment amid global uncertainties

Source: Eco-Business

Jakarta, 25 June: Indonesia needs clear and deliberate policies to counter global protectionism and short-term defences shaping today's markets, which are slowing investments in long-term energy security and sustainability, said leading stakeholders at the flagship Unlocking capital for sustainability summit in Indonesia yesterday.

The tense geopolitical environment has significantly affected Asean's sustainable development path and political conflicts are now a major systemic barrier to the clean energy transition, while disrupting trade and stifling economic growth.

The region will need at least US$200 billion in annual energy investments by 2030, three-quarters of which are earmarked for clean energy projects, and geopolitics will be the decisive factor determining the success of the transition.

Meanwhile, Indonesia's central bank raised its interest rate three times in one month in response to global volatility, a weakening rupiah and growing inflation risks. This, while providing short-term defences, fuels longer-term market uncertainty.

 

Building bankability amid external headwinds

 

Gita Sabharwal, the United Nations (UN) resident coordinator for Indonesia, said these repeated shocks are “reshaping how decisions are made”, with stakeholders shifting focus towards immediate returns as investment horizons shorten and risk appetite tightens.

 

“Under pressure, ESG can sometimes be viewed as a compliance exercise – another report at a time of competing priorities and rising costs. But the evidence is clear … It reduces risk, strengthens supply chains and improves the cost of capital, enabling companies to outperform over time,” she said in her opening address.

 

However, Sabharwal cautioned that the metrics around environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investments must be supported by clear standards, credible taxonomies and transparent disclosure frameworks to allow investors to price risk with confidence.

 

H.E. Denis Chaibi, ambassador of the European Union (EU) to Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam, said investing in the transition is key to enhancing economic competitiveness, but the challenge lies in quantifying the value of these investments.

 

“Competitiveness is at the heart of both Indonesia and EU political debate. In the EU, we have a clear debate between those who feel … that our companies are suffering from the green measures that are not being made competitive,” he said in his special address. “In Indonesia, you always have this dilemma: how can we maximise the resources for coal or palm oil, and how you do put a value on its environmental cost?”

 

He pointed to examples across the EU, such as Spain betting heavily on solar and wind energy to emerge as one of the most profitable destinations for green investments, and highlighted Indonesia's immense carbon market potential following new regulation last year to bolster the market's credibility and competitiveness.

 

“In a country that has so many coal reserves, the carbon markets and the price you put on carbon will be a key element of better resource management and favouring the climate transition,” he said.

 

The link between energy security and economic resilience

 

Meanwhile, the ongoing Gulf conflict exposed structural vulnerabilities within the global energy system, with economic resilience now closely tied to energy security.

 

H.E. Satvinder Singh, deputy secretary general for the ASEAN Economic Community, said the region must accelerate efforts to transition towards a sustainable and diversified energy system, especially in the face of evolving global challenges.

 

“Energy security and sustainability must go hand in hand to support our efforts as a region towards continued growth. For me, economic security today must include our focus on a balanced, inclusive energy transition that supports workers, communities and industries,” he said in his closing keynote address.

 

Organised by Eco-Business in partnership with United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), and held as part of the fifth annual Global Sustainable Development Congress (GSDC), the 2026 edition of Unlocking capital for sustainability – Indonesia convened 120 delegates from government, finance and industry under the theme of “Strengthening governance, securing resilience”.

 

Meaghan See, chief commercial officer for Eco-Business, said the impact of global uncertainties on policy direction, multilateral ties and capital deployment is a stark reminder of how quickly investor confidence can turn when policy direction is unclear.

 

She added, however, that the headways being made in the region are proof that it is no longer a question of whether to invest in sustainable development but how to govern it.

 

“Asia is no longer waiting for a global rulebook to arrive before it acts. Whether it is Indonesia's carbon governance reforms, regional taxonomies maturing across Asean or capital that has already moved past the trillion-dollar mark in sustainable bonds, Asia is writing its own playbook, on its own timeline and often faster than the conversations happening elsewhere. That's not a footnote to the global story. Increasingly, it is the story,” she said.

 

Unlocking capital for sustainability is hosted in six markets across Asia in 2026. In addition to Jakarta, the flagship forum will be hosted in Kuala Lumpur in July, Manila in August, Singapore and Bangkok in September and Hong Kong in November.

 

For more information on next month's Malaysian forum, visit our websitehttps://www.unlockingcapitalforsustainability.com/malaysia/2026

 

About Eco-Business

Established in 2009, Eco-Business is Asia Pacific's leading business intelligence and advisory platform dedicated to advancing sustainable development. We produce trusted, high-quality multimedia content exploring the world's most pressing challenges—and the solutions driving change. Our work is aligned with the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and supported by a 15-year archive of news, analysis, research, and events on sustainable development topics. Headquartered in Singapore, we have a presence in Manila, Kuala Lumpur, Jakarta, Bangkok, Hong Kong, Beijing, and London.

 

For more information, visit www.eco-business.com

 

About UNEP FI

UNEP Finance Initiative brings together a large network of banks, insurers and investors that collectively catalyses action across the financial system to deliver more sustainable global economies.

 

For more than 30 years the initiative has been connecting the UN with financial institutions from around the world to shape the sustainable finance agenda. We've established the world's foremost sustainability frameworks that help the finance industry address global environmental, social and governance (ESG) challenges.

 

Convened by a Geneva, Switzerland-based secretariat, more than 500 banks and insurers with assets exceeding US$170 trillion work together to facilitate the implementation of UNEP FI's Principles for Responsible Banking and Principles for Sustainable Insurance, as well as three UN-convened net-zero alliances. Financial institutions work with UNEP FI on a voluntary basis, and we help them to apply the industry frameworks and develop practical guidance and tools to position their businesses for the transition to a sustainable and inclusive economy.

 

Founded in 1992, UNEP FI was the first organisation to engage the finance sector on sustainability and incubated the Principles for Responsible Investment, now the world's leading proponent of responsible investment.

 

Today, we cultivate leadership and advance sustainable market practice while supporting the implementation of global programmes at a regional level across Africa & the Middle East, Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America & the Caribbean and North America. More details about UN Environment can be found at www.unepfi.org

 

About Unlocking capital for sustainability

Unlocking capital for sustainability is an annual flagship event organised by Eco-Business in partnership with UNEP FI that brings together high-level decision makers in finance, business, government and civic society to discuss and commit to actionable initiatives that mobilise the capital markets for sustainable development projects. Our full list of knowledge partners – past and present – can be found on our website: www.unlockingcapitalforsustainability.com

The Hague presents its own perspective on water safety

Source: The Hague

A 200-metre-wide dune landscape could protect Scheveningen by 2100

The Hague, the Netherlands, 25 June 2026 – How can The Hague remain safe, liveable and attractive for future generations as sea levels continue to rise? To provide insights in the choices, the City of The Hague has developed a long-term vision for the city's coastline, looking ahead to the year 2100 and beyond.

By establishing its own perspective on water safety and resilience, The Hague is taking a leading role as a local partner in addressing water safety challenges, while recognising that the national government and regional water authorities remain primarily responsible. This approach helps ensure that local ambitions are embedded in regional and national decision-making. The vision connects water safety and spatial planning and will inform future policies and projects related to water management and the coast.

Alderman Nur Icar (Climate Adaptation) said: “The Hague is the only major city on the Dutch coast. That makes us unique. We can be proud of our diverse coastline, which offers space for recreation, businesses, hospitality, nature, sports and tourism. At the same time, our location by the sea brings challenges. It makes us vulnerable to rising sea levels. That is why it is so important to understand how we can prepare for this together with our partners and residents. This future perspective is the starting point for that conversation.”

City Behind the Dunes

Sea level rise presents significant challenges, particularly in terms of water safety. In The Hague, the Scheveningen coastline is especially vulnerable because there is limited space to raise and widen the existing sea defences. Unlike other parts of the city's coast, such as the Oostduinpark and Westduinpark, there are currently no dunes that can naturally grow along with rising sea levels.

One promising direction is therefore the ‘City Behind the Dunes’ scenario. Under this scenario, a dune landscape approximately 200 metres wide would gradually develop along the Scheveningen coastline by 2100. This would be achieved through sand nourishment and dynamic dune management.

The dune system would be located seaward of the existing boulevard, while the beach itself would gradually move further out towards the sea. In this way, the coastline can adapt sustainably to rising sea levels. The approach would provide flood protection while also creating opportunities for nature, recreation and biodiversity. To preserve Scheveningen Harbour, technical measures such as a storm surge barrier or lock system may eventually be required.

Next steps

The future perspective is not a fixed plan, but a strategic direction that will be further explored in the coming years to assess its feasibility and effectiveness, alongside other possible measures and combinations of solutions.

The vision was developed in collaboration with experts, government partners, residents and other stakeholders, including the Scheveningen Boulevard Entrepreneurs Association (VBS) and the Association of Beach Operators (VVS).

“It is important to explore how Scheveningen and The Hague can continue to exist safely behind the dunes,” said Henk Kool, Chairman of VBS. “For entrepreneurs along the boulevard, maintaining a view of the sea is an important consideration. But doing nothing is simply not an option.”

Martin Wörsdörfer, Chairman of VVS, added:

“The Hague must remain a city by the sea, not a city in the sea. It is good that entrepreneurs are involved and will continue to be involved in shaping the future direction. We want to continue welcoming beach visitors in a safe and hospitable environment.”

To further develop the vision, the Municipality of The Hague will take an active role in intergovernmental cooperation and discussions with water safety partners. Based on ongoing dialogue with stakeholders and the city, a more definitive course of action will be determined at a later stage.

Read the full article on Stories of Purpose: https://storiesofpurpose.thehague.com/impact/how-hague-preparing-future-rising-seas

University Rankings – Asia’s commitment shines in Times Higher Education Sustainability

Source: Times Higher Education Sustainability

Impact Ratings 2026

  • The University of Manchester in the United Kingdom is number one overall in the Times Higher Education Sustainability Impact Ratings
  • The second highest ranked university is Griffith University in Australia
  • Australia, Malaysia and Canada each have two top 10 universities in overall ranking
  • The United Kingdom dominates number one spots on individual SDG tables, with five first positions and three joint first positions
  • The United Kingdom has the highest number of top 200 universities
  • Asia has the greatest representation – the region accounts for more than half of the universities in the global ranking. Five Asian universities are in the global top 10
  • The Philippines has the most universities in the ranking, 160, making it the global leader in terms of representation. The next best represented country in the table is India, with 110
  • New countries in the rankings are Mali, Nicaragua, Niger and Tajikistan
  • The Times Higher Education Sustainability Impact Ratings (previously known as the THE Impact Rankings) are the only global performance tables that assess universities against all 17 of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals
  • Results continue to be presented as ranked tables: a ranking for each of the SDGs and one overall ranking
  • Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026 released at Global Sustainable Development Congress in Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 1,646 unique institutions from 116 countries/territories ranked across all 18 tables

Top 11 universities in the overall Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

Institution

Country/territory

2026 rank

University of Manchester

United Kingdom

1

Griffith University

Australia

2

Western Sydney University

Australia

3

Queen’s University

Canada

4

Universiti Sains Malaysia

Malaysia

5

Hanyang University

South Korea

6

Hokkaido University

Japan

=7

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Malaysia

=7

Institut Agro

France

9

National Taiwan University (NTU)

Taiwan

=10

University of Alberta

Canada

=10

= joint

Scroll down for a list of the top 100 global universities in the overall ranking as well as tables for the top universities in each region and the top university for each SDG.

Times Higher Education’s eighth annual exercise assessing universities’ progress on the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals is topped by the University of Manchester (United Kingdom), ending the four-year run in first place of Western Sydney University (Australia).

Manchester climbed from number two last year to claim its second top-spot title, having last led the ranking in 2021. Meanwhile, Western Sydney University (Australia) slipped to third position.

In second place is Griffith University (Australia) and Queen’s University in Canada is fourth.

There are five Asian universities in the top 10. Two institutions from Malaysia enter the top 10. Universiti Sains Malaysia is in fifth place and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) is joint seventh alongside Hokkaido University of Japan. South Korea’s Hanyang University is in sixth place.

Continental Europe positioned one institution in the top 10, Institut Agro, in a first for France. The top 10 is completed by the University of Alberta (Canada) and National Taiwan University (NTU) (Taiwan) at joint

10th. The big success story this year is the United Kingdom. Alongside the University of Manchester’s triumph as number one overall, the UK also has three universities with world-best performances on seven individual SDGs. Manchester leads or shares the top position on five SDGs; the University of Huddersfield comes out on top for two SDGS; and the

University of Edinburgh shares one top position. The United Kingdom has 27 institutions in the top 100 for SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production) and 20 for SDG 15 (life on land). The country has the highest number of top 200 universities overall.

France makes its first appearance in the overall top 10 thanks to Institut Agro moving up from joint 23rd last year to claim the number nine spot.

Two institutions from Germany share the number one slot with six others on SDG 9 (industry, innovation and infrastructure).

As was the case last year, Asia is the region with the greatest representation: more than half of universities across all 18 tables are from Asia (962). The Philippines has the most universities in the overall ranking, 160. The next most engaged is India, with 110.

Five Asian universities are in the global top 10, and universities from the region lead on eight of the 17 SDGs.

Hong Kong, South Korea, Thailand and India are leaders of two SDG tables, while China and Malaysia top one each. Malaysia has the highest ranked Asian institution overall, with Universiti Sains Malaysia making its first appearance in the top 10 in fifth place.

Hokkaido University (Japan) returns to the top 10 for the first time since 2022 with its joint number seven position.

Canada has 20 universities in the overall ranking, and two of them are in the top 10. Canada has nine universities among the global top 100.

Canada’s Queen’s University claims the top position on SDG 2 (zero hunger), while the University of Alberta shares the number one slot on SDG 9 (industry, innovation and infrastructure).

The strongest performer from the United States, Arizona State University (Tempe), is at joint 33 this year in the overall table. Arizona State is the only United States institution in the top 50, and there is only one other US institution in the top 100 (Michigan State University in 80th place).

Making their debut in the rankings this year are Mali, Nicaragua, Niger and Tajikistan.

In total, 1,646 universities from 116 countries/territories were ranked across all 18 tables. The Times Higher Education Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026, released this week at the Global Sustainable

Development Congress in Jakarta, are the only global performance tables that assess universities against the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Universities are ranked across 18 tables: one overall ranking and 17 tables representing each individual SDG.

Phil Baty, THE’s chief global affairs officer, said:

“The Times Higher Education Sustainability Impact Ratings is the world’s most comprehensive framework for evaluating and demonstrating universities’ deep social and economic impacts – through their contribution to all 17 of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Universities that take part step forward to submit themselves to an extensive and rigorous assessment on how they are contributing to each and any of the SDGs – through their teaching, their research, their outreach to businesses and communities, and through the stewardship of their own resources, including their estates and their people. “The ratings have become a trusted resource for universities and governments worldwide, so I congratulate all participating universities for going through this assessment process to demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and leadership on the sustainability agenda.

“It is particularly exciting to see the sheer diversity of success stories when it comes to social and economic impact: this rating system proves that excellence comes in many shapes, sizes and contexts – not just from the traditionally dominant universities of the Global North. There are examples of excellence right across the world, with notable successes to be found in abundance in all parts of the world.”

Representation

More than half of universities in the Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026 are from Asia (962). The Philippines has the most institutions in the overall ranking, 160. The next most active country is India, with 110.

Europe is represented by 319 institutions in the ranking. North America has 37 representatives, and Oceania has 33.

Countries with more than 50 representatives are: the Philippines, India, Turkey, Thailand, Indonesia, United Kingdom, Ukraine, Pakistan and Uzbekistan. New to the rankings this year are Mali, Nicaragua, Niger and Tajikistan.

Top 10 countries/territories represented in the overall Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

Country/ territory

Number of universities ranked

Top ranked university

Rank of top institution

Philippines

160

Ateneo de Manila University

201-300

India

110

Lovely Professional University

23

Turkey

74

Bahçeşehir University

=59

Thailand

69

Chulalongkorn University

19

Indonesia

67

Universitas Airlangga

15

United Kingdom

59

University of Manchester

1

Ukraine

55

Interregional Academy of Personnel Management (IAPM)

201-300

Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture

201-300

Country/ territory

Number of universities ranked

Top ranked university

Rank of top institution

Pakistan

52

University of Lahore

71

Uzbekistan

50

Alisher Navo’i Tashkent State University of Uzbek Language and Literature

101-200

Tashkent State University of Economics

101-200

Algeria

46

University of El Oued

201-300

= joint

Note: the figures in the above table relate to the number of institutions ranked in the overall ranking only, not across all 18 tables.

Regional highlights

Central Asia and the Caucasus

Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan jointly lead the Central Asia and Caucasus region in the Sustainability Impact Ratings

2026. Uzbekistan has two universities in the 101-200 band in the overall ranking, and Azerbaijan has one.

Uzbekistan is top in the region for 12 of the individual SDGs, including eight top 20 places. Azerbaijan is first or joint first in the region in five SDG tables.

Uzbekistan holds seven of the top 10 places in the region overall, with the remaining three claimed by Azerbaijan.

The Central Asia and Caucasus region is well represented across the 18 tables, with 102 universities ranked from six countries. Uzbekistan has 50 universities ranked, followed by Kazakhstan with 24 and Azerbaijan with 18.

Tajikistan makes its debut in ranking with one university, Tajik National University, in band 1,001-1,500.

Top 10 universities from the Central Asia & Caucasus region in the overall Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

Institution

Country/territory

Rank 2026

Alisher Navo’i Tashkent State University of Uzbek Language and Literature

Uzbekistan

101-200

Baku State University

Azerbaijan

101-200

Tashkent State University of Economics

Uzbekistan

101-200

National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek

Uzbekistan

201-300

Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanisation

Uzbekistan

201-300

Azerbaijan State University of Economics

Azerbaijan

301-400

Bukhara State University

Uzbekistan

301-400

Khazar University

Azerbaijan

301-400

Samarkand State Medical University

Uzbekistan

301-400

Termez University of Economics and Services

Uzbekistan

301-400

= joint

Asia

There are five Asian universities in the global top 10, led by Malaysia’s Universiti Sains Malaysia in fifth place overall. Malaysia has two top 10 universities with Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia at joint seventh alongside Japan’s Hokkaido University. While South Korea’s Hanyang University takes sixth place.

Taiwan’s National Taiwan University (NTU) is joint 10th.

Some of the biggest movers in this year’s ranking were from Asia – with South Korea’s Hanyang University and Japan’s Hokkaido University both climbing from joint 44th position overall last year into the top 10, and Malaysia’s Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia jumping up from joint 53rd.

Asian institutions lead eight of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals globally.

Hong Kong, South Korea, Thailand and India are leaders of two SDG tables, while China and Malaysia top one each. Asian countries dominate the top of SDG 16 (peace, justice and strong institutions), taking seven of the top 10 places, with Thailand in the lead.

Asian countries dominate the ranking in terms of representation. The five most represented countries in the overall ranking are all in Asia. The Philippines is number one with 160 universities ranked, followed by India with 110, Turkey with 74, Thailand with 69 and Indonesia with 67.

More than half of the universities ranked across all 18 tables are from Asia (962). In total 36 countries are represented.

Top 10 universities in Asia in the overall Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

Institution

Country/territory

Rank 2026

Universiti Sains Malaysia

Malaysia

5

Hanyang University

South Korea

6

Hokkaido University

Japan

=7

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Malaysia

=7

National Taiwan University (NTU)

Taiwan

=10

Korea University

South Korea

=12

Universitas Airlangga

Indonesia

15

Pusan National University

South Korea

=16

Chulalongkorn University

Thailand

19

Kyungpook National University (KNU)

South Korea

=20

= joint

Asean region

Malaysia leads the Asean region with two top 10 universities in the overall rankings. Universiti Sains Malaysia is in fifth place and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia is joint seventh.

Two other universities from the Asean region are in the global top 20: Indonesia’s Universitas Airlangga (15th) and Thailand’s Chulalongkorn University (19th).

Thailand leads two SDGs globally: 16 (peace, justice and strong institutions) and 3 (good health and well-being).

Malaysia is in the lead globally for SDG 17 (partnerships for the goals). With 160 universities ranked in the overall ranking, the Philippines is the most represented country both in the

Asean region and globally. In total, 352 universities were ranked from seven countries in the Asean region.

Top 10 universities in the Asean region in the overall Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

Institution

Country/territory

Rank 2026

Universiti Sains Malaysia

Malaysia

5

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Malaysia

=7

Universitas Airlangga

Indonesia

15

Chulalongkorn University

Thailand

19

University of Malaya

Malaysia

24

University of Indonesia

Indonesia

=31

Universitas Gadjah Mada

Indonesia

=41

Sunway University

Malaysia

45

Thammasat University

Thailand

46

Walailak University

Thailand

47

= joint

Sub-Saharan Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa’s top institution is South Africa’s University of Johannesburg, in joint 39th place overall. Three institutions from Sub-Saharan Africa feature in the global top 100: two from South Africa and one from Nigeria.

Nigeria and South Africa are the only countries from Sub-Saharan Africa to appear in the top 10s for individual SDG tables.

There are 84 universities from Sub-Saharan Africa in the ratings, representing 20 countries.

Nigeria is the region’s most represented country, with 20 universities ranked. The country’s top institution, and second in the region, is Afe Babalola University, in joint 72nd position overall.

Two countries made their debut in the ranking: both Mali and Niger are represented by one university apiece.

Sub-Saharan Africa’s top 11 universities overall in the Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

Institution

Country/territory

Rank 2026

University of Johannesburg

South Africa

=39

Afe Babalola University

Nigeria

=72

University of Pretoria

South Africa

=78

University of Cape Town

South Africa

101-200

University of the Witwatersrand

South Africa

101-200

Covenant University

Nigeria

201-300

Redeemer’s University

Nigeria

201-300

Landmark University

Nigeria

301-400

Makerere University

Uganda

301-400

UGHE – University of Global Health Equity

Rwanda

301-400

Walter Sisulu University

South Africa

301-400

= joint

Oceania

Australia’s Griffith University ranks second overall. Australia’s Western Sydney University has slipped from its place at the top, which it had occupied for four years, dropping down to third place this year.

Nevertheless, Australia has two universities in the global top 10.

Australia leads or jointly leads three individual SDGs globally: SDG 6 (clean water and sanitation), SDG 14 (life below water), and SDG 13 (climate action) – a category in which universities from Oceania hold five of the top 10 places.

Across the 18 rankings, 33 universities from four countries in the Oceania region were ranked (Australia, Fiji, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea).

Top 11 universities in Oceania region overall in the Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

Institution

Country/territory

Rank 2026

Griffith University

Australia

2

Western Sydney University

Australia

3

University of Tasmania

Australia

=16

Central Queensland University

Australia

29

University of Newcastle

Australia

30

Flinders University

Australia

36

UNSW Sydney

Australia

=41

University of Wollongong

Australia

=41

University of the Sunshine Coast

Australia

=59

RMIT University

Australia

=63

University of Technology Sydney

Australia

=63

= joint

North America

Canada’s universities are active participants in the ratings, with 20 ranked in the overall table.

Canada has nine institutions in the top 100 of the overall table, and two of them are in the top 10.

Queen’s University in Canada is the fourth highest rated university globally. Queen’s University claims the top position on SDG 2 (zero hunger), while the University of Alberta shares the number

one slot on SDG 9 (industry, innovation and infrastructure). The United States has 16 institutions ranked in the overall table this year.

The highest-rated institution in the United States is Arizona State University (Tempe) at joint 33rd.

The overall top 100 features only one other university from the United States (Michigan State University at 80th).

Top 10 North American universities overall in the Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

Institution

Country/territory

Rank 2026

Queen’s University

Canada

4

University of Alberta

Canada

=10

Western University

Canada

=12

McMaster University

Canada

18

University of Victoria

Canada

27

Arizona State University (Tempe)

United States

=33

Simon Fraser University

Canada

=52

Université Laval

Canada

=68

York University

Canada

=78

Michigan State University

United States

80

= joint

Latin America

There are 81 Latin America institutions in this year’s global Sustainability Impact Ratings. For the second year running, Latin America has no institution representing it in the top 100.

Tecnológico de Monterrey (Mexico) leads the Latin America contingent with its place in the 101-200 band.

Tecnológico de Monterrey is the regional leader or joint leader on seven individual SDGs. Across Latin America, the next highest rated institution is the Federal University of Minas Gerais (Brazil), which makes an appearance in the top 300. There are in total only seven Latin American universities among the top 400 overall.

Of Latin America countries, Brazil has the most institutions in the ranking, 16. It’s closely followed by Colombia (15) and then Chile and Ecuador (11 each).

Top 17 universities from Latin America in the overall Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

Institution

Country/territory

2026 rank

Tecnológico de Monterrey

Mexico

101-200

Federal University of Minas Gerais

Brazil

201-300

Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul

Brazil

301-400

National University of Córdoba

Argentina

301-400

Simón Bolívar University (Colombia)

Colombia

301-400

University of Guadalajara

Mexico

301-400

Universidad del Desarrollo

Chile

301-400

Adolfo Ibáñez University

Chile

401-600

Londrina State University

Brazil

401-600

Metropolitan Autonomous University

Mexico

401-600

Pontifical Catholic University of Peru

Peru

401-600

Universidad Nacional de Loja

Ecuador

401-600

Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)

Peru

401-600

Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja

Ecuador

401-600

University of Azuay

Ecuador

401-600

University of Concepción

Chile

401-600

University of Santiago, Chile (USACH)

Chile

401-600

Arab world

Eight Arab world universities appear among the global top 100 overall, and four of those are in the top 50.

A total of 260 institutions from the region appear in the ratings. The regional top 10 features institutions from Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Palestine, Lebanon, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt. The region’s top-ranked institution is Jordan’s Al-Ahliyya Amman University, which occupies the number 28 slot. The

region’s next highest-rated institution is Palestine’s An-Najah National University, ranked joint 33rd. Saudi Arabia’s King Faisal University is third in the region at 35. Saudi Arabia has the most universities among the region’s top 10 overall, a total of five.

An-Najah National University (Palestine) is fourth in the world on SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy).

Twenty-three Arab world universities are among the global top 200 overall, and 19 countries from the region are ranked in the global table.

With 46 institutions rated, Algeria is the most represented country in the region. The next most active countries are Egypt, with 45 institutions, and then Iraq, with 43.

Top 23 Arab world universities in the overall Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

Institution

Country/territory

2026 rank

Al-Ahliyya Amman University

Jordan

28

An-Najah National University

Palestine

=33

King Faisal University

Saudi Arabia

35

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)

Saudi Arabia

48

Lebanese American University

Lebanon

55

Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University

Saudi Arabia

=59

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

Saudi Arabia

66

Al Ain University

United Arab Emirates

84

American University of the Middle East

Kuwait

101-200

Applied Science University

Bahrain

101-200

Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport

Egypt

101-200

Aswan University

Egypt

101-200

Canadian University Dubai

United Arab Emirates

101-200

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Saudi Arabia

101-200

Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University

Saudi Arabia

101-200

King Abdulaziz University

Saudi Arabia

101-200

King Khalid University

Saudi Arabia

101-200

Qatar University

Qatar

101-200

United Arab Emirates University

United Arab Emirates

101-200

University Mohammed VI Polytechnic

Morocco

101-200

University of Bahrain

Bahrain

101-200

University of Sharjah

United Arab Emirates

101-200

University of Tunis El Manar

Tunisia

101-200

= joint

Europe

There are 319 European universities ranked, representing 32 European countries. The University of Manchester in the United Kingdom is ranked number one in the overall Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026. The country puts in a standout performance. The United Kingdom has 59 institutions in the ratings, the

most in the region. As well as topping the overall table, United Kingdom institutions lead seven individual SDG tables. The United Kingdom has highest number of institutions in the overall top 200.

The United Kingdom has 27 institutions in the top 100 for SDG 12 and 20 for SDG 15.

Ukraine has 56 institutions in the rankings, the second highest number of participating universities in the region. Five European universities occupy the number one positions on individual SDGs: three are from the United Kingdom;

two are from Germany. There are eight institutions ranked in the top position on SDG 9 (industry, innovation and infrastructure), and among them are four European institutions – two from the United Kingdom and two from Germany.

France is in overall top 10 globally for the first time. Its Institut Agro claims the number nine spot globally and the number two slot in Europe.

Top 10 universities in Europe in the overall Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

Institution

Country/territory

Rank 2026

University of Manchester

United Kingdom

1

Institut Agro

France

9

University of Glasgow

United Kingdom

14

University of Exeter

United Kingdom

=20

Aalborg University

Denmark

25

Northumbria University

United Kingdom

=31

Queen’s University Belfast

United Kingdom

=37

University of Leeds

United Kingdom

=52

Durham University

United Kingdom

=56

University of Bristol

United Kingdom

=56

= joint

Top ranked university for each SDG in the Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026

SDG

Goal

University

Country/territory

SDG 1

No poverty

University of Huddersfield

United Kingdom

SDG 2

Zero hunger

Queen’s University

Canada

SDG 3

Good health and well-being

Mahidol University

Thailand

SDG 4

Quality education

Lingnan University Hong Kong

Hong Kong

SDG 5

Gender equality

Manipal Academy of Higher Education

India

SDG 6

Clean water and sanitation

RMIT University

Australia

SDG 7

Affordable and clean energy

Lovely Professional University

India

SDG 8

Decent work and economic growth

Korea University

South Korea

SDG 9

Industry, innovation and infrastructure

City University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong

Harbin Institute of Technology

China

University of Alberta

Canada

University of Edinburgh

United Kingdom

University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

Germany

University of Manchester

United Kingdom

University of Stuttgart

Germany

Yonsei University (Seoul campus)

South Korea

SDG 10

Reduced inequalities

University of Huddersfield

United Kingdom

SDG 11

Sustainable cities and communities

University of Manchester

United Kingdom

SDG 12

Responsible consumption and production

University of Manchester

United Kingdom

SDG 13

Climate action

University of Tasmania

Australia

SDG 14

Life below water

Griffith University

Australia

University of Manchester

United Kingdom

SDG 15

Life on land

University of Manchester

United Kingdom

SDG 16

Peace, justice and strong institutions

Thammasat University

Thailand

SDG 17

Partnerships for the goals

Universiti Sains Malaysia

Malaysia

Note: Eight universities share the number one position for SDG 9. Two universities share the number one position for SDG 14.

Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026: the world’s top 100 institutions in the overall ranking

Institution

Country/territory

Rank 2026

University of Manchester

United Kingdom

1

Griffith University

Australia

2

Western Sydney University

Australia

3

Queen’s University

Canada

4

Universiti Sains Malaysia

Malaysia

5

Hanyang University

South Korea

6

Hokkaido University

Japan

=7

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Malaysia

=7

Institut Agro

France

9

National Taiwan University (NTU)

Taiwan

=10

University of Alberta

Canada

=10

Korea University

South Korea

=12

Western University

Canada

=12

University of Glasgow

United Kingdom

14

Universitas Airlangga

Indonesia

15

Pusan National University

South Korea

=16

University of Tasmania

Australia

=16

McMaster University

Canada

18

Chulalongkorn University

Thailand

19

Kyungpook National University (KNU)

South Korea

=20

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Hong Kong

=20

University of Exeter

United Kingdom

=20

Lovely Professional University

India

23

University of Malaya

Malaysia

24

Aalborg University

Denmark

25

Kyung Hee University

South Korea

26

University of Victoria

Canada

27

Al-Ahliyya Amman University

Jordan

28

Central Queensland University

Australia

29

University of Newcastle

Australia

30

Northumbria University

United Kingdom

=31

University of Indonesia

Indonesia

=31

An-Najah National University

Palestine

=33

Arizona State University (Tempe)

United States

=33

King Faisal University

Saudi Arabia

35

Flinders University

Australia

36

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham

India

=37

Queen’s University Belfast

United Kingdom

=37

Near East University

Northern Cyprus

=39

University of Johannesburg

South Africa

=39

UNSW Sydney

Australia

=41

Universitas Gadjah Mada

Indonesia

=41

University of Wollongong

Australia

=41

Yonsei University (Seoul campus)

South Korea

=41

Sunway University

Malaysia

45

Thammasat University

Thailand

46

Walailak University

Thailand

47

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)

Saudi Arabia

48

Chiang Mai University

Thailand

=49

Jeonbuk National University

South Korea

=49

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU Taiwan)

Taiwan

=49

Simon Fraser University

Canada

=52

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Hong Kong

=52

University of Leeds

United Kingdom

=52

Lebanese American University

Lebanon

55

Durham University

United Kingdom

=56

Mahidol University

Thailand

=56

University of Bristol

United Kingdom

=56

Bahçeşehir University

Turkey

=59

Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University

Saudi Arabia

=59

University of the Sunshine Coast

Australia

=59

IPB University

Indonesia

62

Lingnan University Hong Kong

Hong Kong

=63

RMIT University

Australia

=63

University of Technology Sydney

Australia

=63

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

Saudi Arabia

66

Istanbul Technical University

Turkey

67

Hong Kong Baptist University

Hong Kong

=68

University of Galway

Ireland

=68

Université Laval

Canada

=68

University of Lahore

Pakistan

71

Afe Babalola University

Nigeria

=72

University of Huddersfield

United Kingdom

=72

Bangor University

United Kingdom

=74

JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research

India

=74

University of Liverpool

United Kingdom

=74

Hiroshima University

Japan

77

University of Pretoria

South Africa

=78

York University

Canada

=78

Michigan State University

United States

80

Chungbuk National University

South Korea

=81

Prince of Songkla University

Thailand

=81

University of Coimbra

Portugal

=81

Al Ain University

United Arab Emirates

84

Newcastle University

United Kingdom

=85

Tunghai University

Taiwan

=85

Daffodil International University (DIU)

Bangladesh

87

Management and Science University

Malaysia

=88

Nottingham Trent University

United Kingdom

=88

Dalhousie University

Canada

90

Khon Kaen University

Thailand

=91

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong

=91

University of Edinburgh

United Kingdom

=91

University of Reading

United Kingdom

=91

IMT Atlantique

France

95

Chonnam National University

South Korea

=96

Massey University

New Zealand

=96

University of Auckland

New Zealand

=96

University of Greenwich

United Kingdom

=96

National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)

Taiwan

=100

Universitas Padjadjaran

Indonesia

=100

= joint

Methodology

The Times Higher Education Sustainability Impact Ratings are the only global performance tables that assess universities against the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We use carefully calibrated indicators to provide comprehensive and balanced comparisons across four broad areas: research, stewardship, outreach and teaching.

There are 17 UN SDGs, and we are evaluating university performance on all of them.

Universities can submit data on as many of these SDGs as they are able. Each SDG has a series of metrics that are

used to evaluate the performance of the university in that SDG.

Any university that provides data on SDG 17 (partnerships for the goals) and at least three other SDGs is included in

the overall ranking.

As well as the overall ranking, we also publish the results of each individual SDG in 17 separate tables.

A university’s total score in a given year is calculated by combining its score in SDG 17 with its best three results on the remaining 16 SDGs. This means that different universities are scored based on a different set of SDGs, depending on their focus. The score for the overall ranking is an average of the past two years’ total scores.

In 2025, participation in the Sustainability Impact Ratings (previously the Impact Rankings) became membership- based. All participating institutions sign up to join the Sustainability Impact Network, the world’s largest higher education membership organisation, and are subjected to the in-depth performance assessment based on their membership. Read the full methodology: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/impact- rankings/methodology

Notes to editors

1. For more information, for a journalist regional resources pack, or to arrange an interview, please email

media@timeshighereducation.com

2. THE is the trusted global data partner for higher education. Drawing on five decades of expertise in the

sector, millions of individual data points and with more unique institutions participating in our flagship university rankings than any other, we offer deeper and richer insight into university performance than anyone else. From powerful data-driven insights and strategic consultancy support to agenda-setting events, student recruitment and hiring solutions, our products and services enable everyone in higher education to make smarter, more informed decisions. For more information visit Times Higher Education or find us on LinkedIn, Bluesky or X: @THEworldunirank @timeshighered

3. Please note the table “Top 11 universities in Oceania region overall in the Sustainability Impact Ratings 2026”

has been corrected.

Solomon Islands – Rural Kings men’s soccer team kicks off campaign with victory in 2026 Inter-Ministry Games

Source: Solomon Islands Ministry of Rural Development (MRD)

The Rural Kings men’s soccer team from the Ministry of Rural Development (MRD) started their campaign in the 2026 Inter-Ministry Games with a strong performance, securing a 1-0 victory against the determined Ministry of Public Service (MPS) in their opening match on Tuesday, June 23, at DC Park.

The Rural Kings entered the competition as underdogs but overpowered their rivals to earn their first crucial three points, setting an encouraging tone for the tournament.

Head coach James Blake commended his team for the decisive win.

“The overall performance from our boys was quite good and exceptional.

“Our opponent is a good side, but credit to the boys for keeping the pressure, and we managed to score the winning goal,” he said.

He also noted that fitness, game understanding, and player coordination are areas that need improvement as they prepare for upcoming matches.

“Our level of fitness, style of play, and team size were not in the best position to counter the most determined MPS side. They are a good team, and we appreciate the challenge they provided, which gave our boys a good run on the field,” he added.

“So far, so good. The Rural Kings team is on the right track to kick off our campaign in this year’s Inter-Ministry Games.”  

Fitness training for the Rural Kings is ongoing ahead of their remaining matches.

Other sports that the Ministry of Rural Development (MRD) is participating in include athletics, volleyball, futsal, netball, basketball, and table tennis.  

Organized by the Ministry of Home Affairs, in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Medical Services, under the theme “Healthy Workforce, Healthy Nation,” the 2026 Inter-Ministry Games event aims to provide an opportunity for public servants to compete, interact, and strengthen working relationships beyond the office through a variety of sporting and team-building activities.  

This annual event brings together over 20 government ministries for an exciting showcase of sportsmanship, teamwork, and healthy living.  

The competition is currently underway, following its official opening on Friday, June 12, 2026.

Global: UN drug control bodies must take urgent action towards ending unlawful use of the death penalty for drug-related offences – Amnesty International

Source: Amnesty International

The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND) must take urgent action to condemn the unlawful use of the death penalty for drug-related offences and work with UN member states towards abolishing this cruel punishment once and for all, Amnesty International and Harm Reduction International said ahead of World Drug Day on 26 June.

Drug-related executions have soared in recent years, representing more than 40% of the total number of executions recorded worldwide. In 2025 alone, close to half (1,257 or 46%) of all known executions recorded independently by Amnesty International and Harm Reduction International were for drug-related offences, in five countries: China, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Singapore. Meanwhile, Algeria, Kuwait, and the Maldives made legislative efforts to expand the scope of the death penalty to include drug-related offences.

Jordan also resumed executions earlier this week, for the first time in nine years, executing six people, while the Prime Minister announced plans to expand the scope of the death penalty to include certain drug-related offences.

“The death penalty is an abhorrent practice with no place in today’s world. As executions for drug-related offences reach shocking levels, the continued silence and inaction from UNODC and the CND is deplorable and leave their stated commitment to human rights empty of meaning,” said Chiara Sangiorgio, Amnesty International’s expert on the death penalty.

“Any use of the death penalty is a violation of human rights. But its use for drug-related offences is prohibited under international law and standards. It is high time that the UN bodies overseeing international drug policy confronted the harms caused by punitive practices and make the abolition of the death penalty a priority worldwide,” said Catherine Cook, Executive Director of Harm Reduction International.

Every year, the launch of the World Drug Report on 26 June provides a public platform for the UN Office on Drugs and Crime to condemn the use of the death penalty specifically as a tool of drug control, and to recommend specific measures that retentionist countries can adopt to bring domestic drug policies in line with international law and standards, as a first step. To date, it’s been falling short.

In a public statement, Amnesty International, Harm Reduction International and 61other organizations, are calling for several concrete and immediate actions from UNODC, including for the World Drug Report to include a specific chapter on human rights, updated information on the use of the death penalty for drug-related offences, and an explicit commitment to promote the abolition of the death penalty in the new UNODC strategy.  (ref. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/act50/1196/2026/en/ )

“The death penalty for drug related offences is unlawful, arbitrary and discriminatory, and it must be tackled head on. As the main UN body overseeing drug control, UNODC can and should play a critical role in turning the tide of executions,” said Chiara Sangiorgio. “Our message today is clear – the world is watching, and we will not stop demanding action until the world is free from the shadows of the gallows.”

Australian communities must do more to prepare for coastal algal blooms

Source: Flinders University

24 June 2026 – The risk of algal blooms is rising around Australia, with a new national study warning that stronger community preparedness is urgently needed for coastal disasters.

A survey of more than 1000 people reveals significant gaps in public awareness of risks such as algal blooms, leaving communities exposed, according to research led by Flinders University and Australian National University academics.

The findings, set to be published in Coastal Futures (online in preprint), draw on feedback from all states and territories about public awareness of events such as algal blooms, which are driven by climate change, pollution and environmental pressures.

“Despite this growing threat, our research shows community understanding of these events and other extreme weather events, and how best to respond to them, remains strikingly limited,” says Associate Professor in Public Health Jacqueline Stephens, who is also a researcher in emergency disaster management at Flinders University.

“While we don’t have a clear understanding of when large-scale events may occur, or the likely scale of the impact, we have a real opportunity to strengthen community preparedness and resilience with targeted education and awareness.”

Researchers emphasise that increasing public knowledge is a critical first step, not only for building community resilience and protecting public health, but also for building informed support for climate change mitigation and adaptation.

Importantly, the research points to a strong public expectation that governments should take primary responsibility for managing such risks. However, recent disaster experiences in South Australia demonstrate the powerful role of communities.

The research, driven by SA volunteers working in the Algal Bloom Shed, was sparked by the widespread algal bloom (HAB) which has hit coastal environments and businesses over the past year.

“Australia has a long history of effective community-led responses – from volunteer fire services to surf lifesaving,” says ANU Associate Professor Amy McLennan, corresponding author on the latest study.

“These community-led organisations are a major asset to Australia, and we may need new ones to address emerging disasters like HABs. Improved awareness of what’s on the horizon is an important step.”

The pre-print study, currently under review, shows that public awareness is low and there is little coordinated effort to prepare communities for the impacts, despite HABs posing a risk to human health, marine ecosystems and local economies.

Hellmann celebrates 20 years of operations in Japan and expands focus on APAC growth

Source: Hellmann Worldwide Logistics

Osnabrueck / Tokyo, June 24, 2026. Hellmann Worldwide Logistics marks the 20th anniversary of its operations in Japan, highlighting its continued presence in a strategically important global logistics market.

Since opening the first office in Japan in 2006, Hellmann has established a focused local presence and gradually developed its service offering to support customers across selected industries, including automotive, fashion, healthcare, and technology. Today, the company provides core logistics services such as airfreight, seafreight, customs brokerage, and selected specialized solutions. With offices in Tokyo and Osaka, Hellmann Japan supports domestic and international customers through tailored logistics services and integration into its global network.

Within its global strategy “Forward2030”, Asia-Pacific (APAC) has been identified as a key growth region, with Japan representing a stable and important market environment. Against this backdrop, Hellmann will continue to develop its activities in Japan in line with customer needs and market opportunities.

“APAC is an important region within our global strategy “Forward2030″ and Japan contributes to this as a mature and innovative market with strong connections to global supply chains. Going forward, we will continue to invest in the region and expand our capabilities to support our customers' growth with integrated, sustainable logistics solutions,” said Jens Drewes, CEO, Hellmann Worldwide Logistics.

“Over the past years, we have grown our APAC presence by broadening our footprint, strengthening local teams, and building more connected solutions for customers across the region. Japan is part of this development: with our teams in Tokyo and Osaka, we have established a strong local foundation that combines market expertise with the reach of our regional and global network. We will build on this momentum and continue to strengthen Japan's role within our broader APAC growth journey,” said Sven Raudszus, Regional CEO APAC, Hellmann Worldwide Logistics.

About Hellmann
Hellmann Worldwide Logistics is a global logistics service provider with a comprehensive service portfolio that includes air- and seafreight, road and rail transport, and contract logistics. With annual revenue of EUR 3.7 bn and more than 12,000 employees in 62 countries, Hellmann moves around 21 mio shipments annually. Based on this broad product range and many years of experience, Hellmann offers innovative logistics solutions for the complex requirements of each individual customer and relies on visionary technical products to ensure maximum customer transparency while creating a more efficient supply chain.